Al Gore will be excited!!!

Pages

422 posts / 0 new
Last post
Plainsman's picture
Plainsman
Offline
AMATEUR
Joined: 6/19/03

No real scientist is going to gamble his reputation on stating things are fact when he can not prove them.  You can say wrong again, but that's like two little boys saying my daddy is stronger than your daddy.  Fact = proof, and all you have offered is circumstantial evidence at best.  That is little more than me predicting it will be dark for a while either side of midnight. 

It's not new research, but a couple of years ago people going back over the genetics of (forget species) found that there was much more genetic code than we thought.  For example each step of the DNA strand we now know controls many things, not just a single attribute.  Likewise many of the things we thought were mutations were already in genetic code of species. 

I think we have a lot of wana be scientists. 

One of my majors was entomology.  I worked extensively with aquatic macroinvertebrates.  Some species can reproduce never having mated.  It's called parthenogenesis.  Now for something interesting.  This also is in their genetic code.  Check it out if your really are interested in science. 

Wednesday's picture
Wednesday
Offline
Joined: 6/9/04

If Lycan puts a backyard beehive in, do you suppose those bees would evolve into a "Super Bee" down the road?  Would this "Super B" have any ties to the dodge car?

Please advise.

I know of a guy that told his girlfriend "I already got a job, what the hell would I need another one for?  Damn crazy woman trying to work me to death with her 'blow job'."  Where does a man with this level of intelligence fall into in the evolution spectrum?  My guess is neanderthal...

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

 

Plainsman Said:
No real scientist is going to gamble his reputation on stating things are fact when he can not prove them.  You can say wrong again, but that's like two little boys saying my daddy is stronger than your daddy.  Fact = proof, and all you have offered is circumstantial evidence at best.  That is little more than me predicting it will be dark for a while either side of midnight. 

It's not new research, but a couple of years ago people going back over the genetics of (forget species) found that there was much more genetic code than we thought.  For example each step of the DNA strand we now know controls many things, not just a single attribute.  Likewise many of the things we thought were mutations were already in genetic code of species. 

I think we have a lot of wana be scientists. 

One of my majors was entomology.  I worked extensively with aquatic macroinvertebrates.  Some species can reproduce never having mated.  It's called parthenogenesis.  Now for something interesting.  This also is in their genetic code.  Check it out if your really are interested in science. 

Wrong, micro and macro evolution has been and still is observed, that is a fact and it is claimed as fact by its observers.

Right, but those discoveries supported and reinforced many of the theories within general evolution.

Right, we do, but not me.  I have zero formal education, I do not claim to be a real scientist like many here, but I can use and exercise the basic scientific method to figure things out and come to conclusions using evidence, observation and testing.

I am very experienced with parthogenesis, I have observed it first hand in my own house with two different species.  Replication is still replication, and there are always errors (mutations) in each replication, good and bad.  A self replicating specie is stll capable of change (evolution)

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 im still curious as to what came before homo sapiens

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

 

severance Said:
 im still curious as to what came before homo sapiens

That compilation of reconstructed faces in the order of there appearance in the fossil record and in the DNA sequences.....did you not see that?

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 

multi-species-angler Said:
 
severance Said:
 im still curious as to what came before homo sapiens

That compilation of reconstructed faces in the order of there appearance in the fossil record and in the DNA sequences.....did you not see that?

recently scientists have discovered that neanderthals may have died out thousands of years before homo sapiens came on  the scene.  a while back they had said perhaps neanderthals lived with modern man for a time before dying out.  in either of these scenarios the result is the same.........

neanderthal could not have been an earlier form of man.  unless of course you want to dispute the legions of scientists who have been involved in these studies.

wouldnt that then mean that you would be going against science to reinforce your beliefs?

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 this was related to a study of modern man and neanderthals in europe.  am i to believe that neanderthals stayed the same in europe but magicaly transformed into homo sapiens elsewhere in the world. then these magical homo sapiens decided to move to europe?

Wednesday's picture
Wednesday
Offline
Joined: 6/9/04

She blinded me, with SCIENCE!!  -  Thomas Dolby

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

 

severance Said:
 this was related to a study of modern man and neanderthals in europe.  am i to believe that neanderthals stayed the same in europe but magicaly transformed into homo sapiens elsewhere in the world. then these magical homo sapiens decided to move to europe?

No, easy misconception, sapens and Neanderthal branched apart from a previous specie.

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 

multi-species-angler Said:
 
severance Said:
 this was related to a study of modern man and neanderthals in europe.  am i to believe that neanderthals stayed the same in europe but magicaly transformed into homo sapiens elsewhere in the world. then these magical homo sapiens decided to move to europe?

No, easy misconception, sapens and Neanderthal branched apart from a previous specie.

and that specie was what?

Alpine's picture
Alpine
Offline
Joined: 1/13/12

"Faith" in something that IMHO cannot be seen, heard, measures or verified and therefore to me has noScientific  validity!"

You have chosen to chase your tail.  If you can see, here, measure, and verify then you would still call it faith?   In tangible terms that is not normally possible.  Hence the definition of the word "faith"??

If you're looking for the validity of man in order to have faith you are already lost.  Not to mention confused. 

""Salvation" is already bought and paid for!?!  HUH?  This is what I have failed to understand since I was old enough to go to Sunday school! "

Yes, yes, that is part of the not paying attention part.  It is clearly covered in scripture by many inspired writers.  Nobody is keeping score, you can not purchase or earn salvation, eternal life.  If that were the case none of us could afford it, and none of us would be pure enough to earn it.  It is ours, we only need to accept it.  That starts by acknowledging the fact humbly that we are sinners.  It ends with a belief.   That belief comes through faith.  All are spoken to, but only some choose to hear the message.

Monkey to man chart is not new.  Attempts were made along the same lines long before DNA was a tool.  Now they have refined this art with learned science, and the face chart is more detailed and prettier.  This is a science still in it's infancy, with hundreds and thousands of missing links.  DNA is right in front of us, it should be easy to make determinations, right?  Thanks to Einstein we know an awful lot more about gravity than we once did.  We still know little about its true framework and wonders, yet it's all around us..........

 

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 im still waiting for you to say homo heidelbergensis so you can describe to me how it evolved into two distinct species and different times.  and how it supposedly died out at roughly the same time homosapiens made it onto the scene.  wouldnt these make it a magical leap to homosapiens without much in the way of evolution(which takes time)  and if theres so much evidence to back this up then where are the verying states of heidelbergensis along the evolutionary road to sapiens?

espringers's picture
espringers
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/25/07

Msa... Is your middle name Google Scholar by any chance? I know full well why u continue to answer them. However, I can't for the life of me figure out why they keep asking you these questions.

Born to hunt and fish... Forced to work!

Plainsman's picture
Plainsman
Offline
AMATEUR
Joined: 6/19/03

That compilation of reconstructed faces

Interpretation = Wild a$$ guess. 

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 

espringers Said:
Msa... Is your middle name Google Scholar by any chance? I know full well why u continue to answer them. However, I can't for the life of me figure out why they keep asking you these questions.

for me its just entertainment. i really dont have a dog in this fight. im not religious and do believe humans had to evolve from somewhere. i just dont subscribe to the arrogance of the scientific community in pretending they know.  theres nowhere near enough evidence for a conclusion

espringers's picture
espringers
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/25/07

One hypothesis is that sapiens drove neandrathals to extinction.

Born to hunt and fish... Forced to work!

severance's picture
severance
Offline
Joined: 4/14/11

 

espringers Said:
One hypothesis is that sapiens drove neandrathals to extinction.

but that wouldnt make sense if neanderthals died out in europe before sapiens even got there

jsthntn's picture
jsthntn
Offline
Joined: 2/27/07

 WHY.........WONT............THIS................THREAD............JUST..................DIEEEEEEEEEE

(and go to heaven)

 "I'll show you where the bear sh**s in the woods!" ~ Dad
(I still have no clue what it means.)

"You're not really even my son." ~ Dad
(I still don't believe him.)

jsthntn's picture
jsthntn
Offline
Joined: 2/27/07

 or hell i suppose?


 "I'll show you where the bear sh**s in the woods!" ~ Dad
(I still have no clue what it means.)

"You're not really even my son." ~ Dad
(I still don't believe him.)

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

if that "evolutionary collision" happened today there would be hiring quotas for those less fortunate "neancy's" - as we conservative sapien FBO bigots would refer to them

they would begin to breed faster than us - and we'd eventually be chin deep in neancy's and the neancy's would be reliant on gov't checks with no hope of a better future and we'd be stuck... cuz we'd be messing with evolution's divine plan for sapienhood

just sayin' that's what would happen, probably


 

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

Plainsman Said:

That compilation of reconstructed faces

Interpretation = Wild a$$ guess. 

says a man with science degrees who puts his faith in an evidenceless hypothesis called creationism, and denies repeatedly tested, observed, peer reviewed, and evidence backed things like evolution.

Plainsman's picture
Plainsman
Offline
AMATEUR
Joined: 6/19/03

Did you miss the part where I said leave religion out of it and I'm against it from a scientific hypothesis. I think the chances are zero that evolution explains anything. I think a lot of people buy into it because they can not stand not knowing everything --- which only they think.

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

Plainsman Said:
Did you miss the part where I said leave religion out of it and I'm against it from a scientific hypothesis. I think the chances are zero that evolution explains anything. I think a lot of people buy into it because they can not stand not knowing everything --- which only they think.

show me the part where I mentioned religion?  evolution explains a lot, not everything, and it has nothing to do with what religion you subscribe to, but you just refuse to look and see for yourself.  you take one discredited scientist and read a couple of conspiracy theory books and think that holds water against hundreds of thousands of books, studies, and observations in support of evolution.

you repeatedly mention your scientific background and scholastic achievements, but keep asking the local forum high school drop out for evidence that you have better access to than I do.  I point you in the direction of the evidence you claim you want to see, and you say "bullshit! science doesn't know everything"  so reply with something a little more enlightening on the topic of evolution than "you can't make a Ferrari appear from nothing in my living room"  straight from the creationist handbook by the way.

You went to college to study this stuff and received degrees in it, why do I have to remind you how to apply the scientific method to something you don't understand?

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

severance Said:
 

multi-species-angler Said:
 
severance Said:
 im still curious as to what came before homo sapiens

That compilation of reconstructed faces in the order of there appearance in the fossil record and in the DNA sequences.....did you not see that?

recently scientists have discovered that neanderthals may have died out thousands of years before homo sapiens came on  the scene.  a while back they had said perhaps neanderthals lived with modern man for a time before dying out.  in either of these scenarios the result is the same.........

neanderthal could not have been an earlier form of man.  unless of course you want to dispute the legions of scientists who have been involved in these studies.

wouldnt that then mean that you would be going against science to reinforce your beliefs?

you're still thinking of evolution as a single line of progression....It is multiple branches of change.

divide a group of one specie, by a river or a mountain rang or place a few on one island segregated from the rest of its own kind.  that group reproduces and passes on traits independently from its original specie eventually forming a completely new one.

After leaving Africa, Homo sapiens was well on its way to becoming 4 or 5 very different species until we developed boats and began intermixing our unique genetic traits again.  and we are still evolving, even visually, look at the average height of humans for example.

look at the scale below and show me the exact point where blue becomes red.  this is how evolution works, a Neanderthal doesn't magically give birth to a homo sapien, it is very gradual over hundreds of generations.

 look at all the different subspecies of giraffe that have spread out into localized populations in Africa.  all these subspecies are derived from one specie, and after hundreds or thousands of years of separation and isolation into their own unique genetics they have began to look different already.  one of these groups may drastically look so different in enough time it may even be classified into a whole different genus.


As far as our exact path from ape like ancestor to who we are today, we are still missing lots of pieces, but, that fact does not negate or falsify evolution, it just means our exact history is still unclear and until contradicting evidence is found to overwhelm the current theories and conclusions about our ancestry.  New evidence is found all the time and fit into the puzzle of humans origins.

those of you that say evolution is just a theory, remember, creationism is just a hypothesis.

Plainsman's picture
Plainsman
Offline
AMATEUR
Joined: 6/19/03

Multi:

says a man with science degrees who puts his faith in an evidenceless hypothesis called creationism

Plainsman:

Did you miss the part where I said leave religion out of it and I'm against it from a scientific hypothesis.
Multi:
show me the part where I mentioned religion?

Are you kidding me.  Anywhere Christianity is mentioned your going to come bashing.  Or you just so pro evolution.  I guess liberals have this thing where they have to come across as intellectuals.  Believing evolution doesn't make you intellectual.  It doesn't make you anything that anyone can prove, but personally I think people who believe evolution are hoping God doesn't exist because of their lifestyles. 

So try to understand this:  with no concern for religion I don't believe evolution.  I think it's one of those things like political correctness and liberals are more likely to be suckers for it in their quest to be the most intellectual.   For example Richard Dawkins is a fanatic Christian hater and only about 1/2 as smart as he thinks.  

Multi I don't think you understand what proof or fact is.  If you did then no one would be disagreeing with you.     It's clear you want evolution to be true.  That doesn't make it so.  Maybe you should pray for it to be true. 

multi-species-angler's picture
multi-species-angler
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/26/09

Plainsman Said:

Multi:

says a man with science degrees who puts his faith in an evidenceless hypothesis called creationism

Plainsman:

Did you miss the part where I said leave religion out of it and I'm against it from a scientific hypothesis.
Multi:
show me the part where I mentioned religion?

Are you kidding me.  Anywhere Christianity is mentioned your going to come bashing.  Or you just so pro evolution.  I guess liberals have this thing where they have to come across as intellectuals.  Believing evolution doesn't make you intellectual.  It doesn't make you anything that anyone can prove, but personally I think people who believe evolution are hoping God doesn't exist because of their lifestyles. 

So try to understand this:  with no concern for religion I don't believe evolution.  I think it's one of those things like political correctness and liberals are more likely to be suckers for it in their quest to be the most intellectual.   For example Richard Dockins is a fanatic Christian hater and only about 1/2 as smart as he thinks.    

you're the one who keeps bringing up liberals, Christians, and religion.  none of which has anything to do with evolution or the evidence supporting it.

you don't believe evolution.  ok, present to us the overwhelming evidence you have to show how the species of animals on this planet change, diversify, and adapt.

espringers's picture
espringers
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/25/07

Hehehe... Msa, the liberal! I effing love it. We have enough debates about enough issues on this site and everyone will eventually be a darn liberal.

Born to hunt and fish... Forced to work!

Plainsman's picture
Plainsman
Offline
AMATEUR
Joined: 6/19/03
 ok, present to us the overwhelming evidence

I don't need to prove anything, I'm just pointing out there is no proof of evolution.  It's theory and I would guess that's all it's ever going to be.   Your the one that wants me to believe it and I can't see any reason to.  What everyone calls evidence I don't see it as such. 

espringer you know why some people hate profiling so much?  Because it works.  You can guess what liberals will be for, and if you know what someone is for you can be nearly sure if they are conservative or liberal.  For example what do you think the psychologists in England and Canada are, the ones that say pedophilia is just normal and people are born that way?  I'll bet I know. 

espringers's picture
espringers
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/25/07

Great comparison! I just find it funny. Anyone who doesn't agree w u... Regardless of the subject... Must now be a liberal. U can't see the humor in it cause to u its black or white. BTW... Nothing he has ever posted makes me think he is a liberal. But, if agreeing with the science behind the theory of evolution makes a person a liberal by definition, then I am a frickin flaming libtard.

Born to hunt and fish... Forced to work!

gst's picture
gst
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 3/12/09

Multi, espringers, I admittedly have not read every single post since page 8, just got in from seeding, but I did read enough to see you guys have no comprehension of what faith is.

I almost feel sorry for people that have to have something they can see, feel, touch, smell, measure, sample, analyze ect.... and can not beleive in something more than that itself.

Enjoy going thru life with the "faith" you and your soul will be nothing more than worm shit when you die.

multi hows your "scientific proof" alligators have morals coming?

Pages