Game warden runs into rock on a section line. Farmer in trouble

Pages

434 posts / 0 new
Last post
gst's picture
gst
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 3/12/09

ChetSpilunkey Said:
 So i guess only the rich get to hunt with your attitude.  Sounds really great for the sport for youth hunters whose dads are just striving to buy the good enough shoes for sports for their kids.  What about the neighbors who live down the road, would you deny them access to hunting because ur a dbag?

If someone wanting to hunt is a "dbag" why should I or any other person have to allow them on lands we may own to hunt?

Foamit Said:
do you go into the local pizza hut, ask for the owner and call him a worthless prick, then expect a good pizza??? 

why do people expect to call farmers and ranchers everything but a white man on line, and get to do whatever they want in the fall??? 

grow up... teach your kids to respect people in order to earn respect...
 

I own no land, and I'm not rich by anyone's standards... and no land owner owes me ANYTHING!!! 

well said.

eyexer's picture
eyexer
Offline
Joined: 2/28/07

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

what the hell is a nuclear pharmacist?  is that a pharmacist with a dirty bomb strapped to his ass?

 

fisherman25's picture
fisherman25
Offline
Joined: 11/26/10

These type of threads are the exact reason why, when you walk up to a landowner and ask permission they have an attitude right away. You don't have to be rich, you have to be smart. If you guys aren't smart enough to understand that you need to keep good relationships with landowners, and that may mean swallowing your political pride, then I don't feel sorry for you.

Don't be surprised if one of them asks you, are you one of them fishing buddy entitlists? Yes they read this crap and get more and more bitter toward people looking to find access to hunt. Keep it up and watch how the "gates open". Fools...

beminoid31's picture
beminoid31
Offline
Joined: 12/26/08

 I know of atleast one rock pile on a prairie trail in the grasslands out west. If I hit said rock pile with my truck can I sue the state/federal govt for putting it there? There isn't another rock for atleast 1/2mi in any direction. They're in a nice neat pile so I know they were placed there. All game n fish did was open a huge can of worms. Warden f'd up why be a bunch of dbags. Maybe I should hit a rd sign along the highway also while I'm at it. 

cant drink all day unless you start in the morning.
Im only one man
GET SOME!!!!!

WellArmed's picture
WellArmed
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 3/9/09

pigsticker Said:
Maybe it's time for ND to enact a No Trespass bill to do away with all of this section line ROW hub-bub.

Then we could be like MT and have a real hard time trying to get anywhere.

We already do, with these toolbags posting everything.

If you were a badminton ace, I think this would be a good bumper sticker:  "Suck my Shuttlecock" 

 

 

 

WellArmed's picture
WellArmed
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 3/9/09

ChetSpilunkey Said:
 Well armed lick my taint

WellArmed Said:
 
skoalongcut Said:
 Easy solution. Don't drive like a dumb ass. It was a rock. Not like it jumped out in front of him.

That's like saying "guy shouldn't have slammed on his brakes" after someone rear ends someone.  
 
Yeah...maybe he shouldn't have slammed on his brakes, but the fact the guy rear ended him trumped the stupidity of slamming on brakes.
 
In this case, the dumbass farmer (if he intentionally put the rock there), trumps the dumbass warden for not paying attention.  

So...I think he should be sued.  

Libs like you are into that sort of thing, aren't ya.

If you were a badminton ace, I think this would be a good bumper sticker:  "Suck my Shuttlecock" 

 

 

 

NDSportsman.'s picture
NDSportsman.
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/13/03

 So the guy offered to pay for the damages and the state decided to take him to court anyway? Sounds like our government!

Dick McFiddleton's picture
Dick McFiddleton
Offline
Joined: 4/9/14

Gst i would take up quilting before ever  wanting to hunt on your land.

gst Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
 So i guess only the rich get to hunt with your attitude.  Sounds really great for the sport for youth hunters whose dads are just striving to buy the good enough shoes for sports for their kids.  What about the neighbors who live down the road, would you deny them access to hunting because ur a dbag?

If someone wanting to hunt is a "dbag" why should I or any other person have to allow them on lands we may own to hunt?

Foamit Said:
do you go into the local pizza hut, ask for the owner and call him a worthless prick, then expect a good pizza??? 

why do people expect to call farmers and ranchers everything but a white man on line, and get to do whatever they want in the fall??? 

grow up... teach your kids to respect people in order to earn respect...
 

I own no land, and I'm not rich by anyone's standards... and no land owner owes me ANYTHING!!! 

well said.

Jig4Pig's picture
Jig4Pig
Offline
Joined: 3/7/10

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

Dick McFiddleton's picture
Dick McFiddleton
Offline
Joined: 4/9/14

 Really?  Try www.google.com  

Jig4Pig Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

Dick McFiddleton's picture
Dick McFiddleton
Offline
Joined: 4/9/14

Hahahah wow

WellArmed Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
 Well armed lick my taint

WellArmed Said:
 
skoalongcut Said:
 Easy solution. Don't drive like a dumb ass. It was a rock. Not like it jumped out in front of him.

That's like saying "guy shouldn't have slammed on his brakes" after someone rear ends someone.  
 
Yeah...maybe he shouldn't have slammed on his brakes, but the fact the guy rear ended him trumped the stupidity of slamming on brakes.
 
In this case, the dumbass farmer (if he intentionally put the rock there), trumps the dumbass warden for not paying attention.  

So...I think he should be sued.  

Libs like you are into that sort of thing, aren't ya.

Farnorth's picture
Farnorth
Offline
Joined: 5/23/02

I see the stupidity of FB is out in force again.

State vehicle damaged.

Clearly driver of the vehicle wasn't paying attention because he was watching potential violators.  In other words, doing his job.  Accidents happen.

Normally State covers cost of damage when the employee is at fault.

Uh oh.  This is different.  Somebody violated the Law by placing the large rock on the section line.  That makes them liable for the damages but you have to establish the violation of State Law by prosecuting.

As a taxpayer, I support what happened.  Fiscal responsibility on the part of our public servants.

300 SKTR's picture
300 SKTR
Offline
Joined: 9/17/07

Who do I get to sue if I hit an under water rock pile in a lake. The way I read this post the state would be responsible. I think the state would be buying a lot of props every year.

Jig4Pig's picture
Jig4Pig
Offline
Joined: 3/7/10

ChetSpilunkey Said:
 Really?  Try www.google.com  

Jig4Pig Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

Sorry, gotta go.  Time to get my prostate nuked.

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

ChetSpilunkey Said:
 Really?  Try www.google.com  

Jig4Pig Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

I knew of which you spoke.

 

doublebarrelsaloon's picture
doublebarrelsaloon
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/22/09

A rock pile on a flooded section line would be a debate worth bringing popcorn to. 

300 SKTR Said:
Who do I get to sue if I hit an under water rock pile in a lake. The way I read this post the state would be responsible. I think the state would be buying a lot of props every year.

I dont go around guessing cup sizes either I just know a nice rack when I see one.

doublebarrelsaloon's picture
doublebarrelsaloon
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/22/09

Make sure you measure first and if it fits the description of "on a section line" have at it. If a guy can drive off the established road because they were driving distracted and still not be at fault you should be in the running for a new truck. You could probably tell them you were texting and still be in the right according to this case. 

beminoid31 Said:
 I know of atleast one rock pile on a prairie trail in the grasslands out west. If I hit said rock pile with my truck can I sue the state/federal govt for putting it there? There isn't another rock for atleast 1/2mi in any direction. They're in a nice neat pile so I know they were placed there. All game n fish did was open a huge can of worms. Warden f'd up why be a bunch of dbags. Maybe I should hit a rd sign along the highway also while I'm at it. 

I dont go around guessing cup sizes either I just know a nice rack when I see one.

Jig4Pig's picture
Jig4Pig
Offline
Joined: 3/7/10
skoalie's picture
skoalie
Offline
LEGEND
Joined: 1/13/07

 

WellArmed Said:
 
skoalongcut Said:
 Easy solution. Don't drive like a dumb ass. It was a rock. Not like it jumped out in front of him.

That's like saying "guy shouldn't have slammed on his brakes" after someone rear ends someone.  
 
Yeah...maybe he shouldn't have slammed on his brakes, but the fact the guy rear ended him trumped the stupidity of slamming on brakes.
 
In this case, the dumbass farmer (if he intentionally put the rock there), trumps the dumbass warden for not paying attention.  

So...I think he should be sued.  

You just made my point. The guy that does the rear ending is always at fault. Consider the rock was slamming on its brakes. The warden rear-ended the rock.

 


"Some days you eat the bear, some days the bear eats you…"
Mossy Oak ProStaff - Make A Difference, Get Involved.
Captain Ahab's picture
Captain Ahab
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/1/08

Jig4Pig Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

Looks like they are not so rich after all:

http://www1.salary.com/Nuclear-Pharmacist-salary.html

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."

"The constitution only gives people the right to pursue hapiness.  You have to catch it yourself."

"Well done is better than well said."

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

All by:  Benjamin Franklin.

"The solution to any problem - work, love, money, whatever - is to go fishing, and the bigger the problem, the longer the trip should be."

Author: John Gierach

Woodpecker's picture
Woodpecker
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/16/01

skoalongcut Said:
 

WellArmed Said:
 
skoalongcut Said:
 Easy solution. Don't drive like a dumb ass. It was a rock. Not like it jumped out in front of him.

That's like saying "guy shouldn't have slammed on his brakes" after someone rear ends someone.  
 
Yeah...maybe he shouldn't have slammed on his brakes, but the fact the guy rear ended him trumped the stupidity of slamming on brakes.
 
In this case, the dumbass farmer (if he intentionally put the rock there), trumps the dumbass warden for not paying attention.  

So...I think he should be sued.  

You just made my point. The guy that does the rear ending is always at fault. Consider the rock was slamming on its brakes. The warden rear-ended the rock.

Appears to be a lot of rear ending going on in this thread

Allen's picture
Allen
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 1/9/02

gst Said:
"trails" thru cropland are not considered established trails.

Who said anything about driving off the section line and through a standing crop?  Pretty sure it wasn't I.

“Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.” ~ Mark Twain

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

Captain Ahab Said:

Jig4Pig Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

Looks like they are not so rich after all:

http://www1.salary.com/Nuclear-Pharmacist-salary.html

I suppose $120k a year is indeed an underwhelming figure compared to the average 21st century farmer.... or Bakken water hauler.

Hey, I know, let's get a thread going where we all bitch about who makes what?

Just kidding. Count me OUT of that debate.

 

Wags86's picture
Wags86
Offline
Joined: 12/14/10

 

Allen Said:

gst Said:
"trails" thru cropland are not considered established trails.

Who said anything about driving off the section line and through a standing crop?  Pretty sure it wasn't I.

what if crops are planted on section line? Could you drive then?

 

 "I get what you're saying:  Like a sausage replica featuring a Polander holding a sacred illumination device." 

 

Dick McFiddleton's picture
Dick McFiddleton
Offline
Joined: 4/9/14

 No!  Why would anyone drive on planted crops?

Wags86 Said:
 
Allen Said:

gst Said:
"trails" thru cropland are not considered established trails.

Who said anything about driving off the section line and through a standing crop?  Pretty sure it wasn't I.

what if crops are planted on section line? Could you drive then?

Captain Ahab's picture
Captain Ahab
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/1/08

guywhofishes Said:

Captain Ahab Said:

Jig4Pig Said:

ChetSpilunkey Said:
Umm at the current prices of land a nuclear pharmacist couldnt afford to buy land.

Foamit Said:
 at the end of the day, if you are going onto posted land (OWNED BY OTHERS WHO DON'T WANT YOU THERE) ,and find it posted, please go somewhere else... 

does this really need to be this complicated???

SOMEONE ELSE OWNS IT!!!

THEY BOUGHT IT!!!

THEY PAY TAXES ON IT!!!

THEY INSURE IT AGAINST PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO WILL SUE THEM FOR SOMETHING STUPID!!! 

THIS IS AMERICA!!!      IF YOU WANT SOME PRIME HUNTING LAND TO HUNT... GO BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!

DON'T EXPECT ME TO BUY IT FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Spunky were you watching  season 8 of trailer park boys when this was written?

Looks like they are not so rich after all:

http://www1.salary.com/Nuclear-Pharmacist-salary.html

I suppose $120k a year is indeed an underwhelming figure compared to the average 21st century farmer.... or Bakken water hauler.

Hey, I know, let's get a thread going where we all bitch about who makes what?

Just kidding. Count me OUT of that debate.

Haha, I hear ya.  The funny thing is there are welders out west with barely a high school diploma making a hefty bit more than a nuclear pharmacist.

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."

"The constitution only gives people the right to pursue hapiness.  You have to catch it yourself."

"Well done is better than well said."

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

All by:  Benjamin Franklin.

"The solution to any problem - work, love, money, whatever - is to go fishing, and the bigger the problem, the longer the trip should be."

Author: John Gierach

Captain Ahab's picture
Captain Ahab
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/1/08

BTW, most farmers are great guys just trying to make a living.  You won't hear me complaining about them in general.  There are a few here and there that sure cause a ruccus though.

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."

"The constitution only gives people the right to pursue hapiness.  You have to catch it yourself."

"Well done is better than well said."

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

All by:  Benjamin Franklin.

"The solution to any problem - work, love, money, whatever - is to go fishing, and the bigger the problem, the longer the trip should be."

Author: John Gierach

feather_duster's picture
feather_duster
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 9/10/06

Wags86 Said:
 

what if crops are planted on section line? Could you drive then?

Yes. seen fish n wildlife guys do it. 

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

Captain Ahab Said:

Haha, I hear ya.  The funny thing is there are welders out west with barely a high school diploma making a hefty bit more than a nuclear pharmacist.

Ah yes - but what is the salary of the nuclear pharmacists in the Bakken?!

 

Captain Ahab's picture
Captain Ahab
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/1/08

guywhofishes Said:

Captain Ahab Said:

Haha, I hear ya.  The funny thing is there are welders out west with barely a high school diploma making a hefty bit more than a nuclear pharmacist.

Ah yes - but what is the salary of the nuclear pharmacists in the Bakken?!

Probably a bazillion. 

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."

"The constitution only gives people the right to pursue hapiness.  You have to catch it yourself."

"Well done is better than well said."

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

All by:  Benjamin Franklin.

"The solution to any problem - work, love, money, whatever - is to go fishing, and the bigger the problem, the longer the trip should be."

Author: John Gierach

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

Captain Ahab Said:
BTW, most farmers are great guys just trying to make a living.  You won't hear me complaining about them in general.  There are a few here and there that sure cause a ruccus though.

yep - and lots of total slob/pig hunters too

basically hunters and farmers are a slice of humanity with enough good ones and totally bastaged ones to make it interesting

 

Farnorth's picture
Farnorth
Offline
Joined: 5/23/02

Wags86 Said:
 

Allen Said:

gst Said:
"trails" thru cropland are not considered established trails.

Who said anything about driving off the section line and through a standing crop?  Pretty sure it wasn't I.

what if crops are planted on section line? Could you drive then?

Legally?  YES. 

Section lines are open to public travel.  It doesn't matter if there is a road there or not.  The only exception is if the County/Township has closed that particular section line.

Should you?  I'd say you better have a damn good reason to go there.

Captain Ahab's picture
Captain Ahab
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/1/08

guywhofishes Said:

Captain Ahab Said:
BTW, most farmers are great guys just trying to make a living.  You won't hear me complaining about them in general.  There are a few here and there that sure cause a ruccus though.

yep - and lots of total slob/pig hunters too

basically hunters and farmers are a slice of humanity with enough good ones and totally bastaged ones to make it interesting

Agreed.

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."

"The constitution only gives people the right to pursue hapiness.  You have to catch it yourself."

"Well done is better than well said."

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

All by:  Benjamin Franklin.

"The solution to any problem - work, love, money, whatever - is to go fishing, and the bigger the problem, the longer the trip should be."

Author: John Gierach

Hardwaterman's picture
Hardwaterman
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 11/6/02

I waited to jump into this, wanted to see how posts would play out. It really amazes me on the ignorance of so many regarding section lines and beyond that this issue as to liability and fault.

I have been fortunate to hunt on this landowners property for a number of years. Never an issue. I traveled down this section line numerous times last fall as well. Yes he did place a large rock on the right of way. It was placed next to a tree as stated that mother nature had deposited.

Without the rock the warden would have damaged his truck as well hitting the tree or bush whatever you want to call it. There was plenty of room to safely travel this trail even at a higher rate of speed had the warden been paying attention period.  Travel tracks where clear and easy to follow.

To me this is a very poor decision by the parties that chose to pursue this against the landowner. It also demonstrates the over zealous attitude this warden has. To not be operating his vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner when there was no emergency nor any call of a violation taking place falls directly on his shoulders. 

I realize that the advent of satellite photos can establish when something was deposited on the section line, but when have we as people lost our common sense.

So while this thread has like so many others degenerated, only a handful really are getting the ignorance of this. I have my opinion on why this was pursued, I have no proof to back it up. I also would hope that someone pursue who made the call on seeking legal action against the landowner. That tidbit would be the most telling in my view.

There are a lot of people who have intentionally tried to obstruct the use of section lines by ripping them up, parking machinery or even stacking round bales for moving across them. These people should be the target, Mr Bear may have technically been wrong but he certainly did not impede or restrict use of that section line to anyone wanting to travel it and that is the key!!! I wonder how many times the wardens where able to traverse to do a field check because Mr Bear and others put in and maintain culverts on section lines or filled in rutted areas and smoothed them down. Granted this benefits them, but they could easily run temp trails through the fields eliminating their use from GW as well. This is one of the most ignorant things our state officials regarding landowners has undertaken!!

In my lifetime I have seen fence row to fence row farming and the return of CRP and game to the landscape.Now we face again the prosepect of fence row to fence row again! Sportsman are our own worst enemy in that we fail to look forward and focus to much on the now!

Crackshot.'s picture
Crackshot.
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/14/09

 

Farnorth Said:

Wags86 Said:
 

Allen Said:

gst Said:
"trails" thru cropland are not considered established trails.

Who said anything about driving off the section line and through a standing crop?  Pretty sure it wasn't I.

what if crops are planted on section line? Could you drive then?

Legally?  YES. 

Section lines are open to public travel.  It doesn't matter if there is a road there or not.  The only exception is if the County/Township has closed that particular section line.

Should you?  I'd say you better have a damn good reason to go there.

Do plots books show closed section lines ?      I think if a section line has been closed it should be marked as closed at both ends with a sign, other wise they are free for all .   Our grandparents signed easements and paid taxes  for us to be able drive down a section line. It was a good thing for many years , what has ruined it for everybody is the invention of four wheel drive and lack of common sense.  Instead of staying off them when they are wet there are weekend warriors that will head down them just for the sake of four wheeling .   

 

 

 

Life is good
 

 

 

 

KurtR's picture
KurtR
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/16/07

 

Hardwaterman Said:
I waited to jump into this, wanted to see how posts would play out. It really amazes me on the ignorance of so many regarding section lines and beyond that this issue as to liability and fault.

I have been fortunate to hunt on this landowners property for a number of years. Never an issue. I traveled down this section line numerous times last fall as well. Yes he did place a large rock on the right of way. It was placed next to a tree as stated that mother nature had deposited.

Without the rock the warden would have damaged his truck as well hitting the tree or bush whatever you want to call it. There was plenty of room to safely travel this trail even at a higher rate of speed had the warden been paying attention period.  Travel tracks where clear and easy to follow.

To me this is a very poor decision by the parties that chose to pursue this against the landowner. It also demonstrates the over zealous attitude this warden has. To not be operating his vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner when there was no emergency nor any call of a violation taking place falls directly on his shoulders. 

I realize that the advent of satellite photos can establish when something was deposited on the section line, but when have we as people lost our common sense.

So while this thread has like so many others degenerated, only a handful really are getting the ignorance of this. I have my opinion on why this was pursued, I have no proof to back it up. I also would hope that someone pursue who made the call on seeking legal action against the landowner. That tidbit would be the most telling in my view.

There are a lot of people who have intentionally tried to obstruct the use of section lines by ripping them up, parking machinery or even stacking round bales for moving across them. These people should be the target, Mr Bear may have technically been wrong but he certainly did not impede or restrict use of that section line to anyone wanting to travel it and that is the key!!! I wonder how many times the wardens where able to traverse to do a field check because Mr Bear and others put in and maintain culverts on section lines or filled in rutted areas and smoothed them down. Granted this benefits them, but they could easily run temp trails through the fields eliminating their use from GW as well. This is one of the most ignorant things our state officials regarding landowners has undertaken!!

stop the presses gst and hardwater agree on a topic.  Hell is freezing and the vikings now have a chance at the superbowl

 Adn

Crackshot.'s picture
Crackshot.
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 7/14/09

 

Hardwaterman Said:
I waited to jump into this, wanted to see how posts would play out. It really amazes me on the ignorance of so many regarding section lines and beyond that this issue as to liability and fault.

I have been fortunate to hunt on this landowners property for a number of years. Never an issue. I traveled down this section line numerous times last fall as well. Yes he did place a large rock on the right of way. It was placed next to a tree as stated that mother nature had deposited.

Without the rock the warden would have damaged his truck as well hitting the tree or bush whatever you want to call it. There was plenty of room to safely travel this trail even at a higher rate of speed had the warden been paying attention period.  Travel tracks where clear and easy to follow.

To me this is a very poor decision by the parties that chose to pursue this against the landowner. It also demonstrates the over zealous attitude this warden has. To not be operating his vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner when there was no emergency nor any call of a violation taking place falls directly on his shoulders. 

I realize that the advent of satellite photos can establish when something was deposited on the section line, but when have we as people lost our common sense.

So while this thread has like so many others degenerated, only a handful really are getting the ignorance of this. I have my opinion on why this was pursued, I have no proof to back it up. I also would hope that someone pursue who made the call on seeking legal action against the landowner. That tidbit would be the most telling in my view.

There are a lot of people who have intentionally tried to obstruct the use of section lines by ripping them up, parking machinery or even stacking round bales for moving across them. These people should be the target, Mr Bear may have technically been wrong but he certainly did not impede or restrict use of that section line to anyone wanting to travel it and that is the key!!! I wonder how many times the wardens where able to traverse to do a field check because Mr Bear and others put in and maintain culverts on section lines or filled in rutted areas and smoothed them down. Granted this benefits them, but they could easily run temp trails through the fields eliminating their use from GW as well. This is one of the most ignorant things our state officials regarding landowners has undertaken!!

  Thanks for some first hand information.      Sort of what I thought all along.     Living proof that if you ever think your going to beat the state /county/township in a courtroom it's important to know that common sense can be brainwashed out of a jury. 

 

 

 

Life is good
 

 

 

 

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

people who needlessly four-wheel and tear the crap out of farm roads and fields is a huge pet peeve of mine, really grinds my gears when I see it

 

Db's picture
Db
Offline
AMATEUR
Joined: 9/11/09

A number of years ago I was traveling down a prairie trail with high grass and hit a rock that had been placed in the middle in the grass (for a reason to remind assholes like I was at the moment that there is no hunting here).
Knew it so ended up only replacing the oil pan.
But guess I was were I should not of been and never cross my mind to sue the farmer for damage. Just glad to get out of there without him knowing I was there.  You do not build good relationships that way.
My father planted right up to the section line as did the neighbor.  I feel if someone had driven on the crop he would have the right to do that but be prepared for the chewing out that would happen.
Out west public land surrounded by private land and the owners said I could not go down the section line to get to their private hunting ground on public land.  A lot of assholes besides me out there.
Had a section line that had a slough across it.  By the term cartway felt the section line did go around the slough and the courts did agree.
But as a small land owner who works and lives in town.  The farmer by his action does not want you on his land.  I do not care what the law says you can do but please respect his/her wishes.  Life is to short. 
I have found working with land owners I have all the land I can hunt on with my bow and have even been offer more places to hunt. 
My son moved to a different place and as a stranger in a community found the same to be true. Two way street. db
By the way all you bow hunters showing off you big bucks are not helping our relationship with gun hunters who already condemn us for what we have.  I do enjoy seeing your success and hopefully I find one and am able to harvest to.

Db

Hardwaterman's picture
Hardwaterman
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 11/6/02

guywhofishes Said:
people who needlessly four-wheel and tear the crap out of farm roads and fields is a huge pet peeve of mine, really grinds my gears when I see it

That trait is universal and not limited to people hunting!! The section line between our property and the neighbor is a mess right now. Worked on it some yesterday to help out making it passable for our renters. The people who own the land and operate the land are not who have torn this two miles up. It is others who to avoid driving good gravel an extra   miles to check fields are the ones. They do not use it for moving grain, cattle or hay. But when it rains they are the first ones to travel down it.

I have many times wanted to OBSTRUCT THIS SECTION LINE ON DAYS OF RAIN OR JUST AFTER TO SEND A MESSAGE TO THEM!!!  

In my lifetime I have seen fence row to fence row farming and the return of CRP and game to the landscape.Now we face again the prosepect of fence row to fence row again! Sportsman are our own worst enemy in that we fail to look forward and focus to much on the now!

doublebarrelsaloon's picture
doublebarrelsaloon
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 4/22/09

I don't think he was talking about people hunting. It's really bad out here now, amazing how many times I hear "I'm fixin' to bring mah muddin' truck up her!" These guys cheer on the rain and head down any trail they can find, it's insane. 

Hardwaterman Said:

guywhofishes Said:
people who needlessly four-wheel and tear the crap out of farm roads and fields is a huge pet peeve of mine, really grinds my gears when I see it

That trait is universal and not limited to people hunting!! The section line between our property and the neighbor is a mess right now. Worked on it some yesterday to help out making it passable for our renters. The people who own the land and operate the land are not who have torn this two miles up. It is others who to avoid driving good gravel an extra   miles to check fields are the ones. They do not use it for moving grain, cattle or hay. But when it rains they are the first ones to travel down it.

I have many times wanted to OBSTRUCT THIS SECTION LINE ON DAYS OF RAIN OR JUST AFTER TO SEND A MESSAGE TO THEM!!!  

I dont go around guessing cup sizes either I just know a nice rack when I see one.

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/4/07

I'm pretty sure tickets/fines are being handed out in Cass County for mudding on roads/fields these days. Not sure what laws they are citing when enforcing.

 

bacon's picture
bacon
Offline
Joined: 1/23/09

 All I know is around here, if you wanted to drive 33 feet on either side of a section line trail, your truck would be wrecked within a mile. We have rocks. Granted not placed there, unless you want to sue the glacier that put them there. This sounds like a warden that thinks a $20 ticket is comparable to murder. Why go flying down a section line. Just wait at the trucks till the guys get back. 

Colt's picture
Colt
Offline
Joined: 10/27/10

I did learn one new thing in these 8 pages, there really is such an occupation as nuclear scientist.  I'll be damned, slap my ass and call me spanky.

Pheasant 54's picture
Pheasant 54
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 5/8/07

I wonder how many times the locals are going to ask this warden if he seen any rocks this fall when he is out checking people on the trails

eyexer's picture
eyexer
Offline
Joined: 2/28/07

Colt Said:
I did learn one new thing in these 8 pages, there really is such an occupation as nuclear scientist.  I'll be damned, slap my ass and call me spanky.

you mean nuclear pharmacist?  nuclear gynocologist

 

Captain Ahab's picture
Captain Ahab
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 12/1/08

Pheasant 54 Said:
I wonder how many times the locals are going to ask this warden if he seen any rocks this fall when he is out checking people on the trails

I bet he is checking fewer people just to not hear that line.  Ha ha.

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."

"The constitution only gives people the right to pursue hapiness.  You have to catch it yourself."

"Well done is better than well said."

"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

All by:  Benjamin Franklin.

"The solution to any problem - work, love, money, whatever - is to go fishing, and the bigger the problem, the longer the trip should be."

Author: John Gierach

Colt's picture
Colt
Offline
Joined: 10/27/10

eyexer Said:

Colt Said:
I did learn one new thing in these 8 pages, there really is such an occupation as nuclear scientist.  I'll be damned, slap my ass and call me spanky.

you mean nuclear pharmacist?  nuclear gynocologist

Darn it.  Wasn't paying enough attention, I meant to type Nuclear Pharmacist.

WellArmed's picture
WellArmed
Offline
GREENHORN
Joined: 3/9/09

I guess the judge or jury will decide whether the landowner is guilty.

Then we'll know for sure. 

If you were a badminton ace, I think this would be a good bumper sticker:  "Suck my Shuttlecock" 

 

 

 

Farnorth's picture
Farnorth
Offline
Joined: 5/23/02

WellArmed Said:
I guess the judge or jury will decide whether the landowner is guilty.

Then we'll know for sure. 

He was convicted July 2, 2014.  Class B Misdemeanor.  $750 fine and $12,000 restitution.  Not sure what appeal rights he has or if he has any plans.

Pages